Please share your thoughts about this article below. No offense, but if you think that is real as posted on the Eric D. Kirk YouTube channel amid a bunch of other satire videos of this actor trying to do comedy sketches, I dont understand how you navigate life. Hi , Frank! Thus, pursuant to International law, he was obligated to protect it which he clearly failed to do. Go do your own research, spend 5, 10, 30, 60 minutes trying to find a video of this man and then come back and vote in my poll.. And please, if you do nothing else, read this.. It needs to be called out as such. Attached is the John Durham Special Counsel Office Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 budget plan. Mr. Joffe, who was already a client of Mr. Sussmanns, brought the matter to him, and Mr. Sussmann relayed those suspicions to reporters and the F.B.I. Mr. Berkowitz noted that Mr. Sussmann had told Mr. Baker that he believed The New York Times planned to publish an article on the Alfa Bank suspicions, which was why he was reaching out. Tom Winter is a New York-based correspondent covering crime, courts, terrorism and financial fraud on the East Coast for the NBC News Investigative Unit. They deserve credit." His appointment came on the heels of a newly released Justice Department report indicating interrogators abused prisoners by, among other things, threatening to kill one man's family and choking another man to the point of unconsciousness. Yes, Im aware he resigned earlier today, effective February 28: JUST IN John Durham to resign from the U.S. Attorneys Office effective at midnight on February 28. Read our full Disclosure. Andrew Harnik/AP. Then returned to Connecticut to join the State's Attorney's office. An observant Catholic and avid Red Sox fan. "I've never met him. Ive been asking for 3 days and so far no one has risen to the challenge. Mr. Sussmann said in a text that he was not bringing it on behalf of any client and was motivated by a desire to help the bureau. Judicial Watch challenged the withheld information, and the DOJ now has re-released the documents without the redactions. But if authenticated, isnt this highly unusual? on behalf of the campaign or Mr. Joffe. Bob Child/Associated Press At the same hearing, a defense. That insinuation also hangs over the other case Mr. Durham has developed, which is set to go to trial later this year. Okay NCAA baseball fans, name an umpire worse than Jeff Head. He served a year in prison. A spokesperson for special counsel Durhams office said the office declines to comment beyond the court filings and any response will be in future filings with the court. The thread that connects them is that the evidence that Durhams team proffered over the course of pre-trial proceedings concerning an allegedly broad, amorphous joint undertaking among an ill-defined network of loosely affiliated individuals spread throughout multiple organizations and institutions was exceedingly thin, based on scattered bits and pieces of information. Copyright 2019 emptywheel. 600.8(a)(1). Some details of that matter remain murky. Three years later, the team led by the special counsel, John H. Durham, on Monday will open the first trial in a case their investigation developed, bringing before a jury the claims and counterclaims that surrounded the 2016 presidential campaign. The Justice Management Division has completed its review under 28 C.F.R. | Though its come to represent much more in the public imagination, the actual charge is quite narrow. With a name like Whitey? Danchenko turns out to have been Steeles principal source for this fever dream. in part on behalf of the Clinton campaign. I continue to find that extremely strange! .hustle-ui.hustle_module_id_1[data-id="1"] .hustle-layout .hustle-button-cta {width:100%!important;font-size:18px!important;}.hustle-ui.module_id_1 .hustle-popup-content {max-width: 400px!important;}.hustle-group-content p {font-size:18px!important;margin: 24px 0 0!important;}.hustle-content-wrap{padding-bottom:0!important;}, We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Douglass Mackey Allegedly Aimed to Depress Black Turnout in Pennsylvania, Release the Kraken: Fox News Revolving Sidney Powell Conspiracy Theory Door. The document production comes in the March 2022 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), filed by Judicial Watch after the DOJ failed to respond to an August 2021, request for records of communication between Special Counsel John Durham and Attorney General Merrick Garland, and all budget records related to the operations of the office of Special Counsel (, Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice. I have personally searched and searched and still nothing. White House spokeswoman on Monday referred all questions about Special Counsel John Durham's investigation to the Department of Justice . The strategy, as the government will argue at trial, was to create news stories about this issue, about the Alfa Bank issue, Andrew DeFilippis, a prosecutor for Mr. Durham, said at a recent hearing. Through his court filings, Mr. Durham and his team have signaled that they suspect that the Alfa Bank data or analysis may have been faked, even though they were unable to prove it. "), (Read "Officials Defend CIA's Use of Contractors. in September 2016, when he relayed suspicions about possible cyberconnections between Mr. Trump and Russia. As NBC News has previously reported,Sussmanns indictment says that he was advising the Clinton campaign in 2016 about cybersecurity matters and that a partner at his firm served as general counsel for the campaign. Judicial Watch Victories: Courts Declare California Quota Laws Unconstituti BEST OF: Top Anti-Corruption Victories in 2022. As you probably recall, they did supposedly instigate a new policy the Obama years as to taping. One person did some great detective work and determined that even the 4-5 photos look rigged: A couple of you both sent me this message, which is very weird: Up above you can see I posted a video by an actor (comedian?) After that, today comes this video from yet another YouTube channel that basically just ripped off Eric D. Kirks video and made it more crappy: Read the comments, so many people are thinking this is surely Durham: A reader sent me this report, which I have NOT been able to independently verify. The same restrictions pertain to a U.S. president. 23d. (Boston Globe, January 7, 2008), "He's such a decent guy you can't hate him. Most of his videos are parodies or comic sketches. The case against Sussmann was curious from the start, because it was apparent that Durhams team was less interested in a discrete misrepresentation to the FBI during a single meeting than it was in the broader and arguably unseemly opposition research work of the Clinton campaign, its lawyers and the investigative firm Fusion GPS. . (Hartford Courant, January 28, 2001), "He's Fitzgerald with a sense of humor." who posts videos online under the name Erik D. Kirk. So what happened? Still, the judge has given prosecutors broader latitude to call witnesses associated with the Clinton campaign, including Mr. Elias and Robby Mook, the campaign manager. Beginning Monday morning in Washington, special counsel John Durham the prosecutor who was appointed in 2019 by Attorney General William Barr to investigate the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation in the wake of the Mueller report finally gets to present his case to a jury in federal court. The brief was nominally about whether Sussmanns law firm may have had a conflict of interest in representing Sussmann a very tenuous claim that was eventually resolved in favor of Sussmanns lawyers. Ankush Khardori, an attorney and former federal prosecutor, is a Politico Magazine contributing editor. The judges rulings were thoughtful and well-reasoned, which managed to obscure just how unusual it is for prosecutors to be so thoroughly constrained from presenting the case that they want. While as President, Trump is free to abrogate the bilateral agreement, there is no indication that this was his intent. WASHINGTON When the Trump administration assigned a prosecutor in 2019 to scour the Russia investigation for any wrongdoing, President Donald J. Trump stoked expectations among his supporters that the inquiry would find a deep state conspiracy against him. No, Im saying not one single video of the man exists online! AP Photo/Jon Elswick, The trial beginning this week was supposed to be the culmination of an otherwise spotty and languorous investigation, now entering its fourth year. Cybersecurity expert Rob Graham told NBC News that what Joffe appeared to have been doing was a search for domain names and addresses to which a computer had tried to connect. John Durham, appointed by then-Attorney General William Barr in 2020 to probe the origins of the FBI's investigation of Russian election interference, said "Tech Executive-1," not named in . Last year, he charged a Russian analyst who was a source for the Steele dossier with lying to the FBI. After all, Danchenko, like Sussmann, is charged with lying to the FBI, and a jury may once again be left to wonder whether the bureau was actually fooled. The disclosure about Joffe, who has not been charged, came in a filing in the court case of Michael Sussmann, a lawyer whom Durhams office indicted in September in connection with allegations of lying about his relationship with the 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. The investigation helped inspire the Martin Scorsese film The Departed. I actually think this is a major story just waiting to blow up. Foreign leaders do not have the right to unilaterally disclose U.S. classified information that has been shared with their country pursuant to a bilateral agreement. I have come to know and discover that John Durham did not exist prior to 2018. That last one should be grabbing our attention. .hustle-ui.hustle_module_id_1[data-id="1"] .hustle-layout .hustle-button-cta {width:100%!important;font-size:18px!important;}.hustle-ui.module_id_1 .hustle-popup-content {max-width: 400px!important;}.hustle-group-content p {font-size:18px!important;margin: 24px 0 0!important;}.hustle-content-wrap{padding-bottom:0!important;}, We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Ill wait patiently over here but I know you cant. Big Tech Protected Joe Biden o BEST OF: Big Tech Censorship EXPOSED! John Durham, appointed by then-Attorney General William Barr in 2020 to probe the origins of the FBIs investigation of Russian election interference, said Tech Executive-1, not named in the filing but first identified by The New York Times as Rodney Joffe, used his access to domain name system, or DNS, data to compile information about which computers and servers the White House servers were communicating with. Judicial Watch Sues Air Force Academy for Records about Critical Race Theor DOJ & FBI Target Biden Political Opponents, Judicial Watch Warns: Critical Race Theory Rising. The defendant is Michael Sussmann, a lawyer who worked at the outside law firm representing the Clinton campaign, and he is facing a single count of lying to the FBIs top lawyer in the run-up to the election in order to instigate a criminal investigation into Trump. Read our full Disclosure. Read More Most recent Durhams investigation continues and has resulted in one other indictment besides Sussmanns. The judge ruled, for instance, that Durhams team cannot suggest to the jury that the data provided to the FBI by Sussmann had been improperly obtained or used by Joffe, since prosecutors had failed to provide sufficient evidence showing that Mr. Sussmann had concerns that the data was obtained inappropriately, or that he had any independent knowledge about the data collection beyond whatever he may have learned from Mr. Joffe through privileged communications., Even more significantly, the judge curtailed Durhams ability to present evidence on the question that seems to have been driving the case from the start in particular, whether, as Durham claimed in court filings, there was a wide-ranging conspiracy comprised of officials from the Clinton campaign, the campaigns lawyers, Joffe, Fusion GPS and an assortment of IT professionals to prevent Trumps election by assembling and disseminating the [Alfa Bank] allegations and other derogatory information about Trump to the media and the U.S. government., The court concluded that while Durhams team had proffered some evidence of a collective effort to disseminate the purported link between Trump and Alfa Bank to the press and others, the contours of this venture and its participants are not entirely obvious. The judge went on to observe that it was far from clear that the researchers who were not employed by Mr. Joffe, Fusion GPS, or the Clinton Campaign, and most of whom never communicated with Mr. Sussmann shared in this common goal, and, as a result, ultimately held that Durham had failed to justify what would essentially amount to a second trial on a non-crime.. The first case developed by the special counsel, John Durham, involves a lawyer who is accused of lying when he shared a tip with the F.B.I. Durham released an official announcement saying he would resign effective at midnight Sunday. to share the material, Mr. Sussmann reached out to James A. Baker, then the agencys top lawyer. Under international law, this bilateral executive agreement obligated the U.S. to protect the information. As it is, the court seems to have conscientiously attempted to wade through a thicket of unusual and complex legal issues in order to focus the trial on what should be at issue based on the crime that Durham actually charged whether the alleged misrepresentation by Sussmann actually occurred and, if so, whether it had a material effect on the FBI, as Durham has claimed.
13826559d2d51515baf152958f72dcd6 Is It Safe To Send Passport Copy By Whatsapp, Myponga Reservoir Cafe, Hall Of Shame Fox, Articles J